Hibridizarea învăţământului – o soluţie de viitor? – O cercetare comparativă offline versus online –

Authors

  • Mihaela Bețiu UNATC ”I.L. Caragiale”, Bucharest, Romania Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37130/mjs6g967

Keywords:

online teaching, offline teaching, advantage, disadvantages, substitute methods, direct methods, criteria of judgmenet of differences, research, contact-based teaching, hybrid teaching

Abstract

In the fields of Theatre Performing Arts and Film and Media only some of the specializations are theoretical, most of them being eminently practical, based on active-participatory methods and self-experimentation. Research specific to the actor’s art, choreography, (theatre, film and TV) directing, scenography or the art of puppetry has at its center the human body and, in the case of online education, the emphasis is formally shifted to its image. In other words, the challenge is huge and the long-term impact of this type of education cannot be yet quantified. The article „Hybridization of Education – A Solution for the Future?” is a research related to the advantages and disadvantages of offline education versus online education from the point of view of the acting teacher and her students, a generation whose training began online in the context of the 2020 pandemic, later also benefiting from face-to-face classes. Following the analysis of the Top 5 advantages and disadvantages of both types of education, the evaluation criteria used were evident, highlighting: the criterion of social affiliation, the criterion of physical performance, the criterion of health effects, the financial criterion, the technical performance criterion, the time management criterion, that of accessibility, comfort, direct experience, cognitive development, emotional development, artistic performance, the criterion of general learning ability, that of creativity development, the criterion of professionalization. The analysis of the results leads to the conclusion that, despite a number of benefits of online learning, the benefits of direct learning are still major. Online education is and remains a replacement for the direct way of communication, a substitute with a second choice function, with multiple disadvantages related to the quality of the educational process as a whole. In the future, offline-online hybridization will be chosen, but this should only be done for courses with content that can be transmitted and received in this manner, following a carefully conducted research. Education and consequently the ways in which it is achieved is responsible for shaping the future of humanity.

Author Biography

  • Mihaela Bețiu, UNATC ”I.L. Caragiale”, Bucharest, Romania

    Mihaela Beţiu is an Associate Professor, PhD, at the Theatre School of UNATC „I.L. Caragiale” Bucharest, holder of the Game and Improvisation course within the PED-ArtE interdisciplinary MA (collaboration UNATC – University of Bucharest), trainer, theatre, film and television actress, collaborator of the Craiova National Theatre, „C.I. Nottara” and „Ion Creangă” Theatre, editor-in-chief of the „Concept” academic journal, expert contributor for MEN and CNEE, scientific supervisor for first and second grades in pre-university education, translator of the last edition of „Improvisation for the Theater” by Viola Spolin (UNATC Press 2008, 2014), academic books editor. She succesfully defended in 2008 her PhD thesis entitled „The Actor and Performance between Norm and Deviation”, she was Director of the Research Department and Vice-Dean of the Theatre School (UNATC), trainer and long-term expert for the European Project „Communication Skills. Performance in Education” (2010-2013). Published books: „Actor between Norm and Deviation” (UNATC Press, 2020), „The Acting Candidate’s Guide” (UNATC Press, 2016), „Elements of Stage Process Analysis. Three Key Moments in Acting Pedagogy: Andreea Perrucci, K.S. Stanislavski, Viola Spolin” (UNATC Press, 2019); co-author of „Shakespeare in the Study of the Actor’s Art” (2016).

References

ARHIP, Otte (2015) Teoria comunicării, Editura Junimea, Iași

ARMSTRONG, Dr. Thomas (2019) Ești mai inteligent decât crezi, Curtea Veche, București

BROOK, Peter (1997) Spaţiul gol, traducere Marian Popescu, București, Editura UNITEXT

CERGHIT, Ioan (2008) Sisteme de instruire alternative și complementare – Structuri, stiluri și strategii, Ediția a II-a, revăzută și adăugită, Polirom, Iași

CERGHIT, Ioan (2006) Metode de învăţământ, Editura Polirom, Iaşi

COJAR, Ion (1998) O poetică a artei actorului, ediţia a III-a, Editura Paideia în colaborare cu Unitext, Bucureşti

CRISTEA, Sorin (2017) Instruirea. Procesul de învățământ, Didactica Publishing House, București

GARDNER, Howard (2015) Inteligente multiple, Editura Sigma, București, 2015

MESSINGER, Joseph, MESSINGER, C., (2013/2014) Cartea gesturilor. O gramatică gestuală completă, explicată şi ilustrată, Editura ALL, București

PÂNIȘOARĂ, Ion-Ovidiu (2006) Comunicarea eficientă, Ediția a III-a, revăzută și adăugită, Polirom, Iaşi

SPOLIN, Viola (2008 ediţia integrală, 2014 ediţia prescurtată), Improvizație pentru teatru, trad. Mihaela Bețiu, UNATC Press, Bucureşti

TRAN, Vasile, STĂNCIULESCU, Irina (2003) Teoria comunicării, Editura Comunicare.ro, Bucureşti

https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/computers-in-human-behavior/vol/62/suppl/C

http://www.johnseelybrown.com/Growing_up_digital.pdf

https://mgsii.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/curs4-limbajul-verbal-si-non-verbal-romana.pdf (Dr. Codruţa Popescu)

https://www.ted.com/talks/ken_robinson_says_schools_kill_creativity?language=ro

Downloads

Published

2020-06-02

How to Cite

Bețiu, M. (2020). Hibridizarea învăţământului – o soluţie de viitor? – O cercetare comparativă offline versus online –. CONCEPT, 20(1), 22-37. https://doi.org/10.37130/mjs6g967