Global Mapping of Theatre Pedagogy: From the Conservatory Model to the Epistemic Hybridization of the 21st Century
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37130/z0a3qq98Keywords:
theatre pedagogy, epistemic hybridization, thinking practitioner, practice as-research, decolonization, university modelsAbstract
This article investigates the reconfiguration of university theatre pedagogy in the context of the epistemic transformations of the 21st century, tracing the transition from the vocational conservatory paradigm to the model of “epistemic hybridization” specific to the contemporary university of arts. The study explores how theatre universities have transformed institutions from knowledge transfer into research laboratories based on the concept of “Thinking Practitioner”. Through a comparative analysis, four major pedagogical matrices are mapped: the conservatory centred on guild tradition and technical rigor; the American MFA model, which integrates artistic practice within the liberal arts; the GITIS-type theatre institute model, organized around the master-led workshop; and the integrated arts university model, oriented towards interdisciplinarity and digital technologies. The research examines the theoretical contributions of Erika Fischer-Lichte, Hans-Thies Lehmann, and Robin Nelson to the consolidation of Practice-as-Research methodologies, while also highlighting the current vectors of change—digitization, curricular decolonization, and applied theatre. It argues that the contemporary theatre university trains artist-researcher profiles capable of operating simultaneously in the fields of aesthetic innovation and social responsibility.
References
Adler, S. (1990) The Technique of Acting, New York: Bantam.
Balme, C. (2021) “Theatre and the University: Historical and future perspectives”, Symbolon Special Number: Global Theatre: Haunted History in Eastern Europe.
Boal, A. (2017) Teatrul oprimaţilor şi alte poetici politice, Trad. Georgiana Bărbulescu, București: Nemira.
Baker, G.P. (2011) Dramatic Technique, Cambridge: The Riverside Press.
Carlson, M. (1993) Theories of the Theatre, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Clurman, H. (1983), The Fervent Years: the Group Theatre and the Thirties, New York: Grand Central Publishing.
Dixon, S. (2025) Digital Performance. A History of New Media in Theatre, Dance, Performance Art and Installation, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Fischer-Lichte, E. (2014) Theatre and Performance, Oxford: Routledge.
Lehmann, H.-T. (2006) Postdramatic Theatre, Oxfordshire: Taylor & Francis Ltd.
Nelson, R. (2022) Practice as Research in the Arts (and Beyond), Switzerland AG: Springer Nature.
Oyewo, S.O. (2020) Committed Theatre in Nigeria: Perspectives on Teaching and Practice, Maryland: Lexington Books.
Pavis, P. (2012) Dictionar de teatru, Traducere din limba franceză de Nicoleta Popa-Blanariu şi Florinela Floria, Iaşi: Fides.
Schechner, R. (2013) Performance Studies: An Introduction, Oxford: Routledge.
Stanislavski, K. S. (2013) Munca actorului cu sine însuşi, Trad. Raluca Rădulescu, București: Nemira.
Strasberg, L. (2024) Visul unei pasiuni, Trad. Adrian Buz, București: Fundația Culturală Camil Petrescu.
Ouyang, Y., Park A., and Suh K.H. (2024) “Psychological Predictors of Attitude toward Integrated Arts Education among Chinese College Students Majoring in the Arts”, in Behavioral Sciences 14, (10/2024), 869.
Balme C.B (2021) „Theatre and the University: Historical and Future Perspectives”, Symbolon Special number: Global Theatre: Haunted History in Eastern Europe.