Archaic Heritage of Theatre Practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37130/kr7gjr34Abstract
The treatises on drama and performance, Poetics by Aristotle and Nāṭyaśāstra by Bharata Muni reveal archaic elements, valid even today, offering two different perspectives on relating to artistic experience and understanding the body - mind binomial. Whether the steps of a theatrical method are described, or the rules of a technique are postulated, the practice behind any performance or performative action will, however, remain constant. Artistic practice is linked to a working philosophy and an awareness of the ideological structure on which an artistic product is built. This is one of the most important elements that a performer can use, because knowing what and why you act in a certain specific way is the very path to a self-definition and an articulation of the new languages of performing art, encountered more frequently in performative spaces.
References
Aristotel (1965). Poetica. Traducere de D.M. Pippidi. Bucureşti: Ed. Academiei Republicii Populare Române.
Bharata Muni (2016). Nāṭyaśāstra. Traducere de Amita Bhose şi Constantin Făgeţan. Bucureşti: Cununi de Stele.
Destrée, P., Heath M., Munteanu, D.L. (eds.)(2020). The Poetics in Its Aristotelian Context. London and New York: Routledge.
Gupt, Bharat (2016). Ancient theatre concepts. Greek and Indian. Nāṭyaśāstra and Poetics. New Delhi: D.K. Printworld(P) ltd.
Schechner, Richard (1997). TDR, vol. 41, no. 2, The MIT Press, pp. 153-156.
Singh, Sahana (2017). The Educational Heritage of Ancient India. How an Ecosystem of Learning was Laid to Waste. Chennai: Notion Press.
Tcherkasski, Serghei (2016). Stanislavsky and Yoga. New York: Routledge. Zarrilli, Philip (2020). (toward) a phenomenology of acting. New York: Routledge.