A Case of Reception of the Ancient Greek Medea of Euripides: When Medea of Euripides Meets Medea of Anouilh and of Bostantzoglou
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37130/cqsp0064Keywords:
Medea, Euripides, Ancient Greek drama reception, Medea’s reception, Jean Anouilh, Mentis Bostantzoglou (Bost)Abstract
The Archetype of Medea has been thoroughly examined and Medea has been identified as a symbol of darkness, vengeance and ferocity. Meticulous analysis of Euripides’ Medea reveals a multi-dimensional personality, a divine creature, skillful, alluring and human in her essence. The article aims to examine how Euripides’ character and speech were perceived by playwrights Jean Anouilh and Mentis Bostantzoglou (better known under the pen name of Bost). All three pieces of literature discuss the eternal themes of love, vengeance, motherhood, betrayal and moral ethics. Euripides, Anouilh and Bost showed fidelity to the myth of The Argonauts, drawing on its symbols and archetypes. Nevertheless, considering the historical era in which the dramatists created their plays, we could discern the adaptations they made in order to diversify the messages they intended to communicate. Anouilh, who was mainly affected by the Second World War, presents a more humanized Medea, sentimental and totally absorbed in her erotic passion for Jason. Medea becomes completely annihilated at the end of the play as the loss of her children leads to the end of her life. Bost reveals a hilarious Medea and the parody revolves around her and the other characters showcasing all traits of modern Greek society in the 20th century. All these varied approaches determine and deepen our belief in Medea’s unique strong personality and the timelessness of human condition.
References
Abdulrahman, A.M. (2015) “Médée d’Euripide et d’Anouilh”, International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 2(2), p. 22-32.
Allardyce, N. (1970) History of World Drama. Athens: Evroekdotiki.
Anouilh, J. (1989) Medea – Iezabel. Athens: Dodoni Publications.
Bakonikola-Georgopoulou, H. (2000) Rules and Exceptions. Athens: Ellinika Grammata.
Bergson, H. (1998) Laughter: An essay on the Meaning of the Comic. Athens: Exadas.
Bierl, A. (2016) “Germany Austria and Switzerland” in Van Zyl Smit, B. (ed.) A Handbook to the Reception of Greek Drama. West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell, p. 258.
Bostatzoglou, M. (1993) Medea. Athens: Theatre Stoa.
Coupe, L. (2009) Myth. 2nd ed. London and New York: Routledge.
Euripides (1994) Medea. Athens: Kaktos
Genette, G. (2018) Palimpsests. Second grade literature. Athens: Educational Foundation of the National Bank.
Kosmopoulou, D. (2020) Theatrical writing and Semiotics Theory. Athens: Dromon.
Kosmopoulou, D. (2022) “Screams and Passions of a Foreigner: Medea of Anouilh and the Great Chimera of Karagatsis” in Markantonatos, A. Georgopoulou, B. Kosmopoulou, D. (ed.) The Divine and the Polis in Euripides. Athens: E.I.P.
Kraias, G. (2023) “The evolution of the tragic from Aeschylus to Shakespeare: One intertextual approach of the Seven on Thebes and Macbeth”, Paravasis, 17-18(2), p. 19- 42.
Markantonatos, A. (2022) “The Moral Dimension of Attic Drama”, in The Concept of Moral Debt in Ancient Greek Theatre. Athens: E.I.P.
Mastronarde, D.J. (2002) Euripides: Medea (trans). 7th ed. Athens: Patakis Publications. Mercier, C. (1995) Pour saluer Jean Anouilh. Paris: Bartillat, p. 38-39.
Miles, S. (2016) “Greek Drama in the Hellenistic World” in Van Zyl Smit, B. (ed.) A Handbook to the Reception of Greek Drama. West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell.
Patsalides, S. (2019) Theatre and Theory II. Thessaloniki: University Studio Press.
Pefanis, G. (2001) Themes of Post-War and Contemporary Greek Theatre. Athens: Kedros. 20. Revermann, M. (2016) “The Reception of Greek Tragedy from 500 to 323 BC” in Van Zyl Smit, B. (ed.) A Handbook to the Reception of Greek Drama. West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell, p. 13.
Segal, C. (1968) Interpreting Greek Tragedy: Myth, Poetry, Text. USA: Cornell University Press.
Schlesinger, E. (1966) “On Euripides’ Medea”. Hermes, 94(1): p. 26-53.
Slater, N.W. (1985) Plautus in Performance: The Theatre of the Mind. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Smith, C. N. (1985) Jean Anouilh, Life, Work, and Criticism. London: York Press.
Touchard, P. A. (1991) Dionysos: An Apology for the Theatre. Athens: 21 Century Publications.
Warner, R. (1955) “The Medea” in Grene, D. and Lattimore, R. (ed.) The Complete Greek Tragedies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Boedeker, D. (1991) “Euripides Medea and the Vanity of ΛΟΓΟΙ”, Classical Philology, 86(2), p. 95-112. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/270231 (Accessed: 22 July 2024).
Diamantakou-Agathou, K. (2010) The Contradictions of a Mother Murderer. Available at: https://www.eens.org/EENS_congresses/2010/Diamantakou-Agathou-Kaiti.pdf (Accessed:18 August 2024)
Encyclopedia Universalis France [Online] Available at: https://www.universalis.fr/index/comedie-burlesque-cinema/ (Accessed: 10 August 2024).
Lanbadaridou-Pothou, M. (2004) “Antigone or the Nostalgia of Tragedy: A Contemporary Notion of the Tragic” (speech). International Convention of Ancient Greek Drama in Delphi. Available at: https://marialampadaridoupothou.gr (Accessed: 10 August 2024).
Norton Anthology of Drama Glossary [Online] Available at: https://www.wwnorton.com/college/english/nadrama/content/review/glossary/B.aspx (Accessed: 17 August 2024)
Rambaux, C. (1972) Le mythe de Médée d’Euripide à Anouilh ou l’originalité psychologique de la Médée de Sénèque. Latomus, 31(4), p.1010–1036. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41528524 (Accessed: 22 July 2024)
Tyminski, R. (2014) “The Medea Complex-Myth and Modern Manifestation”, Jung Journal: Culture & Psyche, 8(1), 28-40, https://doi.org/10.1080/19342039.2014.866032 (Accessed: 4 August 2024).
Vasillopoulos, C. (2014) “Through a glass darkly: Medea as a reluctant Goddess”, Jung Journal: Culture & Psyche, 8(1), 41-56, https://doi.org/10.1080/19342039.2014.866033 (Accessed: 4 August 2024).
