The Role of Critical Culture in the Age of AI: The Thinking Festival – «Our World: A Crisis of Meaning»
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37130/ncjb7b45Keywords:
critical thinking, artificial intelligence, epistemology, cultural education, transdisciplinarity, storytelling, robotics, ethics, humanism, immersive pedagogy, interdisciplinary dialogue, digital culture, meaning crisis, educational innovationAbstract
This article explores the interplay between technology, knowledge, and meaning in the age of artificial intelligence and cultural automation. Drawing from the inaugural Thinking Festival—an interdisciplinary event hosted in November 2024 at the University Politehnica of Bucharest—the study examines how lectures, workshops, and debates fostered reflection on ethical and epistemological challenges posed by technological transformation. Under the central theme “Our World: A Crisis of Meaning,” the festival convened students, academics, entrepreneurs, and international thinkers, offering a space for dialogue across fields. Featured guests included writer Paul Kingsnorth, robotics expert Rustam Stolkin, researcher Felicia Milian, and storyteller Daniel Druhora, whose contributions bridged disciplines such as extreme robotics, bioethics, literature, and digital culture. These encounters created a rich environment for questioning how meaning is shaped or fragmented in technologically mediated societies. The article argues that idea-driven festivals like this one can serve as laboratories of critical thinking, offering young people tools to navigate a reality increasingly shaped by automation and symbolic disorientation. It also underscores the importance of transdisciplinary dialogue and reflexive education in fostering a renewed culture of meaning in the post-digital age.
References
Barad, K. (2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv12101zq
Borgmann, A. (1984) Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life: A Philosophical Inquiry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Buber, M. (1970) I and Thou. Translated by Walter Kaufmann. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Chaparro-Banegas, N. and Mas-Tur, A. (2024) “Artificial intelligence and critical thinking in educational contexts: A systematic review,” Journal of Educational Technology Research, 45(3), pp. 234-251.
Clark, S.G. and Wallace, R.L. (2015) “Integration and interdisciplinarity: concepts, frameworks, and education,” Policy Sciences, 48(2), pp. 233-255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-015-9210-4
Dewey, J. (1938) Experience and Education. New York: Macmillan.
Ellul, J. (1964) The Technological Society. New York: Vintage Books.
Freire, P. (1970) Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Godemann, J. (2008) “Knowledge integration: a key challenge for transdisciplinary cooperation,” Environmental Education Research, 14(6), pp. 625-641. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620802469188
Harari, Y. N. (2018) 21 Lessons for the 21st Century. London: Jonathan Cape.
Hayles, N. K. (1999) How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226321394.001.0001
Hooks, b. (1994) Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/para.1994.17.3.270
Illich, I. (1971) Deschooling Society. New York: Harper & Row.
Khalabuzar, O. and Shymanovych, I. (2024) “AI-mediated learning environments and
critical engagement in language education,” Educational Technology International, 28(4), pp. 112-128.
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
Makhachashvili, R. and Semenist, I. (2024) “Transdisciplinary frameworks in AI-enhanced education: A sociocultural perspective,” Contemporary Educational Research, 32(2), pp. 89-105.
Nolan, K., Thompson, R. and Davis, M. (2025) “Care-based pedagogies in transdisciplinary education: Empathy and critical thinking in practice,” Journal of Educational Innovation, 41(1), pp. 45-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON62633.2025.11016618
Nussbaum, M. (2010) Not for Profit: Why Democracy Needs the Humanities. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Okada, A., Chen, L. and Rodriguez, P. (2025) “The CARE-KNOW-DO model: UNESCO guidelines for transversal skills in AI contexts,” International Educational Development, 29(3), pp. 178-194.
Pedersen, D. B. (2016) “Integrating social sciences and humanities in interdisciplinary research,” Palgrave Communications, 2, article 16036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2016.36
Serres, M. (1982) The Parasite. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Somerville, M. A. and Rapport, D.J. (eds.) (2002) Transdisciplinarity: ReCreating Integrated Knowledge. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780773586215
Turkle, S. (2011) Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. New York: Basic Books.
Wu, J. (2024) “Pedagogical design for critical thinking in the ChatGPT era,” Educational Technology Review, 38(5), pp. 201-218.
