International Collaboration in Film Production Education: Pedagogical Approaches at Master’s Level

Authors

  • Anamaria Antoci I.L. Caragiale National University of Theatre and Film, Bucharest, Romania Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37130/5r42f573

Keywords:

film education, international collaboration, co-production, experiential learning, network development, curriculum design, pedagogical models, European cinema

Abstract

This paper examines the pedagogical frameworks that inform the teaching of international film production collaboration at the master’s level. Through an analysis of current educational practices, industry integration mechanisms, and the evolving landscape of European co-production models, this research illuminates how higher education institutions prepare emerging filmmakers for the complexities of transnational cinema production. The findings suggest that effective pedagogical approaches must synthesise theoretical knowledge with practical industry engagement, whilst fostering networks that transcend national boundaries. This research contributes to the ongoing discourse on film education methodologies by proposing a more holistic approach to preparing students for the increasingly globalised nature of contemporary film production.

Author Biography

  • Anamaria Antoci, I.L. Caragiale National University of Theatre and Film, Bucharest, Romania

    Anamaria Antoci is a seasoned producer in the European market and a member of industry networks such as EAVE, ACE Producers, European Producers Club, Inside Pictures. She founded in 2017 the Bucharest based company Tangaj Production, being fully committed to all creative stages, with a passion for authentic, strong arthouse films, keen on pursuing ways to tackle audiences in a unique manner. Aside from producing, Anamaria is heavily involved in film education and training. She served as tutor and board member on several training and mentoring programmes while also giving lectures for the Master programme in film production at the I.L. Caragiale National University of Theatre and Film, where she is also a PhD student researching Audience Design.

    ORCID record: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3818-4515

References

Akerman, C. (1992) Screening Europe: Image and Identity in Contemporary European Cinema. (D. Petrie, Ed.) London: British Film Institute.

Battistela, C., De Toni, A. F., & Pillan, M. (2019) “Environmental and social sustainability in the film industry: A comprehensive model for supporting decision making”. Journal of Cleaner Production, pp. 671-684.

Bennett, M.J. (1993) “Towards ethnorelativism: A developmental model of intercultural sensitivity”, in Paige, M.R. (ed.) Education for the Intercultural Experience, Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press, pp. 21-71.

Bergfelder, T. (2005) “National, transnational or supranational cinema? Rethinking European film studies”, Media, Culture & Society, 27(3), pp. 315-331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443705051746

Betz, M. (2001) “The Name above the (Sub)title: Internationalism, Coproduction, and Polyglot European Art Cinema”. Camera Obscura, 16(1), pp. 1-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/02705346-16-1_46-1

Bruner, J. (1960) The Process of Education, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 7. Caldwell, J.T. (2008) Production Culture: Industrial Reflexivity and Critical Practice in Film and Television, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Chan, K. (2010) “Teaching international film history in a globalised classroom”, Journal of Cultural Research in Art Education, 28, pp. 123-145.

Clair, R. (1953) Reflections on the Cinema. London: William Kimber.

Dand, C., & Harrison, J. (1965) Educational and Cultural Films: Experiments in European Co-Production. Strasbourg: The Council of Europe.

de Valck, M. (2007) Film festivals: From European geopolitics to global cinephilia. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9789048506729

Dewey, J. (1938) Experience and Education, New York: Macmillan.

Elsaesser, T. (2015) European Cinema: Face to Face with Hollywood, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Finney, A. (1996) The State of European Cinema: A New Dose of Reality. London: Cassell. 15. Hayward, S. (1996) Cinema Studies: The Key Concepts. London; New York: Routledge. 16. Hjort, M. (2010) “On the plurality of cinematic transnationalism”, in Durovicová, N. and Newman, K. (eds.) World Cinemas, Transnational Perspectives, New York: Routledge, pp. 12-33.

Kolb, D.A. (1984) Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355

Marino, S. (2015) “The Europeanness of European Cinema. Identity, Meaning, Globalization”. Transnational Cinemas, 6(2), pp. 206-207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20403526.2015.1074419

Petrie, D. and Stoneman, R. (2014) Educating Film-Makers: Past, Present and Future, Bristol: Intellect. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv36xvhbb

Schön, D.A. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, New York: Basic Books.

Trăilă, A. (2023) Filmul european în era politicii comunitare post 1989, Bucureşti: UNATC Press.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wayne, M. (2002) The Politics of Contemporary European Cinema: Histories, Borders, Diasporas, Bristol: Intellect.

Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Antoci, A. (2025). International Collaboration in Film Production Education: Pedagogical Approaches at Master’s Level. CONCEPT, 30(1), 229-244. https://doi.org/10.37130/5r42f573